ETHICS AND MANAGERIAL CHOICE PPM 501

Spring 2008

 

Bill Myers                                                                                

Classroom: HB 228                                                                 

Wednesday, 6-9

Office: HC 222                                                            

Phone: 226-4868

Office Hours: M 12:30-2:00; W 1-4; TTH 10:00-11:00; and by appt.                   

Email: bmyers@bsc.edu           

Homepage: http://csunx4.bsc.edu/bmyers

           

REQUIRED TEXTS:

            Ethical Theory and Business, Beauchamp and Bowie, eds. (7th ed.) ETB

            A course packet.

            Articles from the course webpage.

 

OBJECTIVES:

The primary objective of this course is to enable you to raise effectively ethical issues related to the general managerial process. In recent years, managers in both the private and public sectors have been called upon to evaluate more carefully their roles as decision makers and to evaluate their decisions from an ethical perspective.  Both the popular and professional journals have given much space to the ethical problems managers face. While it is surely not the case that making ethical decisions is the exclusive domain of the philosopher, it is an assumption of this course that philosophy with its long history of the discussion of ethical problems can make some contribution to the issues at hand. In order to develop skills in this area, we will examine some of the classical writers in philosophical ethics as well as commentators on the more specifically designed area of management.

 

METHODS AND STRUCTURE:

            Our classes will be a blend of lecture, discussion, cases studies and class presentations. As a community of inquiry, we will be learning from one another. As such, it is imperative that for each meeting, you read carefully the materials for that day. This kind of course only works when all are prepared.

 

ASSIGNMENTS:

            1. Paper and Panel: Each of you will turn in a paper on one of four cases (weeks 6, 8, 9, or 10). Your paper should focus on an analysis of the ethical and managerial issues involved in the case along with a possible solution or recommendation. Your paper should be 6-8 pages (at least six!), to be handed in to me at the beginning of the class period. On the evening your paper is due, you will participate in an informal panel discussion of the case, utilizing the analysis delineated in your paper. See below for more details.

2. A final paper of 2500-3000 words (8-10 typewritten pages) will be required. For this paper, there is a great deal of latitude in regard to the subject matter. The issue(s) you address, though, must deal with some ethical question concerning problems of managing. While you certainly need not limit yourself to the topics actually covered in class, you must demonstrate a command of the relevant tools of analysis derived from the class.  Your topics for this paper may be of two varieties:

            (a) A case of your own devising, from your own experience, research, etc. If you choose this option, you should give enough details of the situation to make the case meaningful to an outsider. Then you analyze the case as we have been doing all semester, making certain that you bring the relevant theoretical considerations to bear.

(b) An issue which arises in the readings and/or discussion which you would like to explore without the apparatus of a case analysis. You might wish to explore, for example, the more abstract topics of economic justice, the morality of a capitalist system, preferential treatment, etc.

This final paper will be due on May 14 at our scheduled final exam time. In preparation for your final paper, I will accept proposals for your topic no later than April 16 (though I will take them any time before then). While these proposals are not required, it is in your best interest to at least approve your topic. If you do not have it approved, and your general topic is unacceptable (e.g., irrelevant for our class), then your paper will receive a failing grade.  Also, I have had some difficulty with students turning in papers that do not have properly documented sources. You must document your sources fully! As graduate students, it is simply unacceptable for you to turn in work that is not documented. Undocumented papers will be returned, uncorrected, with a failing grade. If you have any doubt as to the proper procedures for documenting sources, there are numerous resources available (e.g., Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writing Term Papers, or see my handout at http://csunx4.bsc.edu/bmyers/PAPER.htm). Any consistent and complete method of citation is acceptable. The consistent part is obvious--pick a method, and only one method, and use it. By complete I mean that you must offer enough information to enable me to go directly to the proper page of the cited source. Also, please observe the following requirements (if you think they're nit-picky, consider--why needlessly annoy the person grading your essay?): Number your pages. Staple your pages in the upper left hand corner. Do not use plastic report covers. Leave reasonable margins.  Observe the required page limits. Use a standard 12 point font. Put a word count on the first or last page of your essay.

3. On week three you will be evaluated on your understanding of the theoretical discussions of the previous two weeks. In order to prepare for this, I will give you a list of questions at the end of the first or second week. You should be prepared to discuss those questions in class and to hand in your written answers. Note that the written part of this is to be fairly informal.  Don’t break your back trying to type up anything fancy. These can be handwritten.

            4. Your informed participation is assumed. You are expected to have read carefully the materials for the week. I will have no hesitancy in calling on anyone, whether a hand is raised or not. Each student is expected to attend all of the class meetings and to be an active participant in those meetings. If you are not able to attend class or you are not able to be prepared, you should let me know. If your job takes you away from class time, or you are ill, you should prepare a brief analysis of the major issues assigned for that day. Note that this paper is not required. But, if you do the short paper and it is satisfactory, the absence will be nullified. You may do this no more than two times.  But, note carefully: Each unredeemed absence will count significantly against the participation portion of your grade.

 

GRADING:

            The final paper, panel paper, and your class participation will each count for 30% of your grade, and the discussion from week three counts for 10%.  Evaluation of class participation is, as you can imagine, difficult at best, but the “Guidelines for Class Discussion” (given below) will be used in an attempt to be fair. Evaluation of papers is also difficult. I attempt to evaluate them according to the criteria noted below. I assume that everyone enrolled in this course has the ability to perform well and I expect each of you to make an acceptable grade.

 

Some guidelines for paper and panel:

            Remember, your presentation should focus on the assigned case with an eye towards the relevant assigned readings.  That is, you should analyze the case in terms of the broader issue for that week. Ideally, we will all have read the case, so you should not get bogged down in the facts. I want you to cut right to the chase. Please note that outside research for this project is encouraged but not required.

On your assigned evening, your group will gather at the front of the class. I will pick someone to start--that person will then take about five minutes (maybe a bit more, but not less) to present his/her basic perspective on the case at hand. Others will do likewise, though we don't need to do it in simple, serial fashion--that is, we want to have a discussion of the issues at hand.

Your paper should be considered a formal paper, and it must be formatted as such. All sources must be fully documented and cited. If the sources are not adequately cited, I will return the paper to you for correction, and a late penalty will be assessed. Please note that the paper is the primary source of the grade, not the discussion, though the discussion will go towards your participation grade. Also, please remember the page requirements--at least six pages.

 

General Guidelines for papers:

            In developing a well-argued position on a case, you should be concerned with the relevant facts and with the implications of alternative courses of action. You should defend your proposed course of action or position with reasonable arguments. The articles in our text (as well as the ample outside sources available) should help your support your position.

            As noted above, a major assumption of this course is that the philosopher has something relevant to bring to the ongoing dialogue concerning moral issues in management. Your paper should address that assumption, either explicitly utilizing the philosophical categories presented or rejecting the relevance of such categories with solid supporting arguments. Remember to consult my handout on writing papers for further guidelines

 

Some guidelines for evaluating your papers:

            (1) If the paper is about a particular case, are the facts of the case fairly presented? Succintness and precision are to be valued over extensive and repetitive summaries.

            (2) Are various alternatives noted, discussed, considered, and analyzed? Are the consequences of alternative positions examined fairly?

            (3) Are the appropriate theoretical categories used to shed light on evaluate the situation described?

            (4) Does the paper utilize articles from the text to aid in the analysis? Are other sources, when available, brought to bear on the analysis of the problem?

            (5) Are the uses of sources properly documented with standard citation paraphernalia, e.g., Turabian, MLA/APA?

 

 

Guidelines for Class Discussion:

            The following guidelines have been borrowed and adapted from Kirk Hanson of Stanford University School of Business.

            (1) Are the points made substantive, relevant to the discussion? Are they linked to the comments of others?

            (2) Is the participant a good listener? Do comments show the participant has been listening?

            (3) Do comments show evidence of analysis of the issue at hand?

            (4) Do comments add to our understanding of the situation?

            (5) Does the participant distinguish among different kinds of data (i.e., facts, opinions, beliefs, etc.)?

            (6) Is there a willingness to test new ideas or are all comments “safe” (e.g., repetition of case facts without analysis and conclusions)?

            (7) Is the participant willing to interact with other class members?

            (8) Do comments clarify and highlight the important aspects of earlier comments and lead to the clearer statement of the concepts being covered?

            (9) Has the participant attempted to bring other readings, both from the text and from other sources, to bear on the cases under consideration?

            (10) Do the comments show awareness of the ethical dimensions of the problem at hand and do these comments fit into a consistent, coherent ethical framework?

            As you prepare for discussion, you should not only know the details of the cases but you should hypothesize concerning alternative situations which might arise. In effect, you will be doing “what if” analysis. Then you will want to know if changing the factors or assumptions will alter our ethical evaluations of the case. In preparing for the discussion, be sure to relate the current issues raised both with the other issues we have already discussed and with any relevant theoretical considerations.

 

HONOR CODE:

            All work at Birmingham-Southern is done under the student honor code. If you have any doubts about the application of the code, be sure to see me about it.

 

TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE

 

1. Feb 6           Introduction to the course. Some introductory discussion of ethical theory.

                        Reading: ETB 1-44

 

2. Feb 13         Continued.

                        Reading: “The Good of Activity.”

                        Case: “The Parable of the Sadhu.” (Packet).

 

3. Feb 20         Graded discussion and exam. Then:

Issues Internal to the Corporation: Rights and Obligations

                        Reading: ETB 257-263; 266-296; 473-494

Case: Peter Green's First Day (Packet); discussion of a number of privacy issues raised in the readings.

 

4. Feb 27         Continued.

                        Reading: Short cases on privacy and the workplace.

 

5. March 5       Sexual Harassment

                        Reading: ETB 329-331; 361-374; 389-391

Case: Sexual Harassment (Packet).

 

March 12: No class—I’m out of town.

 

 

6. March 19     Whistleblowing

                        Reading: ETB 297-310; 263-265

                        Case: Ethical Quagmire (Packet) (Presentations)

 

March 26: Spring Break!

 

7. April 2          Issues External to the Corporation: The Purpose of a Corporation.

Reading: ETB 45-50

                        Case: Roger and Me This is not in your book! We'll watch the movie in class.

 

8. April 9          The Purpose of the Corporation, continued.

                        Reading: ETB 50-83

                        Case: Tennessee Coal and Iron (Packet) (Presentations)          

 

9. April 16        Corporate Character and Individual Responsibility

                        Reading: ETB 95-146

                        Case: McWane Pipe (Presentations)

 

10. April 23      Consumer Risks: Product Liability

                        Reading: ETB 166-170; 175-189

Case: Managing Product Safety: The Ford Pinto (Packet) and "Pinto Madness" by Mark Dowie.  (Presentations) 

 

11. April 30      Bluffing, Sales and Advertising

                        Reading: ETB 401-453

                        Case: Presentation on advertising and sales. No case for tonight.

 

12. May 7        Social and Economic Justice (Rawls, Nozick, and Singer)

                        Reading: ETB 630-676; Thomson handout.

See also Harvey Cox, "The Market As God"

 

13. May 14      PAPERS DUE!!

 

 

Back to Bill's Page